Raymond Lustig & George Manahan |
Here's
some of what we learned:
Well,
we knew this already, but technology continues to be the dog in musical
performance, even though we're trying to use something no more complicated than
Google Hangouts, something designed to be the most reliable, user-friendly
software. We had trouble linking up with our Manchester partner Dane Lam
until the very end. But at least when we did, it was really informative.
We
learned that the transatlantic link to Manchester seems to a good deal slower,
stickier, uglier, which is great! This is what we're looking for, the
problems, the limitations of the technology.
Raymond Lustig & Derek Bermel |
Most
of my test canons yesterday were swirly in continuous note values throughout,
but Derek Bermel encouraged me to do more with canons of greater textural
variety within, periodic aural landmarks that the listener hears go by at
different times in each voice, and that can create their own polyphonic
independence of voices.
I'll
probably include some sweet diatonic (scaler) canons in the set, but
diatonicism under aleatoric circumstance just becomes pan-diatonicism (all the
notes of the scale), whether the delay is 1 beat or 10 beats. Pretty, but
the degree of delay doesn't really make much difference to the sound.
More interesting for me are canons in which the degree of delay changes the
music by degrees, so most of my canons to date cycle through the keys via the
circle of fifths. Thus when delays are short, the music sounds diatonic
and consonant, but as delays get longer, the sound gets crunchier and spacier
as the voices get into more and more distant key relationships. I like
this because it makes the degree of delay matter a lot in the musical result,
rather than delay being merely this random offset of music that would sound
more or less the same with a long or a short delay. That said however,
sonic variety between the various canons might suggest having some diatonic
canons interspersed in the complete set.
George Manahan conducts remotely |
Much
of what we learned was about the setup possibilities of who is where, who is
playing what, and who is following which conductor. Morton Subotnick
suggested two interesting possibilities: Crossing conductors (having onstage
players follow a remote conductor, and remote players follow George Manahan
onstage at Zankel Hall), and choose-a-conductor (individual players choose
which of the conductors to follow, which actually helps because some of the
players, like the harpist, have trouble seeing the screen from the stage, and
could therefore just follow their local conductor). But in the end we
agreed a variety of conformations, specified in advance in the score, will
probably be best.
Plus
a lot of other things. But that's all for now.
No comments:
Post a Comment